A Federal High Court in Abuja has
ordered the EFCC to `immediately’ return to the former presidential candidate
of the African Liberation Party, Osita Okereke, two of his seized utility
vehicles.
They are Toyota Land Cruiser SUV
with registration No. FE 03 ABJ and Toyota Hilux pickup with registration
number FE O16 ABJ.
Delivering judgment yesterday in a
suit brought by Okereke, Justice Elvis Chukwu held that the evidence before him
showed that the vehicles were unlawfully confiscated.
Okereke, who is Chairman of the
National Task Force on Illegal Importation, Smuggling of Goods, Small Arms,
Ammunition and Light Weapons, also approached the court to challenge his arrest
and detention by the commission.
``I have gone through the arguments
and evidence before me and I do find merit in some of the prayers made by the
plaintiff.
``It is therefore ordered that the
two cars of the National Chairman of the African Liberation Party (ALP) seized
by EFCC since Jan. 24, 2013 be released to him immediately,’’ he said.
Chukwu held that EFCC failed
woefully in court to establish that the two vehicles were products of fraud.
``Since no crime has been
established against the plaintiff in respect of the two sized cars, there is no
basis for their continued seizure especially without a court order,’’ he said.
The judge further held that ``from
the totally of the defence put up by the EFCC, there is nowhere a point was
made that the two cars were products of fraud committed by the plaintiff’’.
``There is no order of any court to
back up the seizure of the two cars, hence, the owner should not be denied the
right to own moveable properties,’’ Chukwu held.
However, the judge declined to
declare the arrest unlawful, illegal and baseless as prayed by the plaintiff.
``The EFCC has power to arrest and
seize properties of any Nigerian on reasonable suspicion of having committed a
crime,’’ he said.
Okereke had dragged the anti-graft
agency before the Federal High Court asking that his arrest and detention from
Jan. 23 to Jan. 25 be declared illegal, unlawful and a breach of his
fundamental right.
Mr Goddy Uche, counsel to the
plaintiff, had asked the court to compel EFCC to pay him the sum of N5 million
in damages for the embarrassment caused him by the EFCC action.
Challenging the relieves, Mr Andrew
Akoja, counsel to the EFCC, asked the court to dismiss the case of the
plaintiff on the ground that it had statutory power to arrest, detain and seize
properties suspected to have been fraudulently acquired.
Akoja
said that the commission did not violate the fundamental right of the plaintiff
in any way and that ``he was granted administrative bail the day he was
arrested but failed to meet the conditions.’’
No comments:
Post a Comment